Commit Registration

Microsoft and many other technology companies manage their cer­ti­fi­ca­tion programmes through Prometric. I was reg­is­ter­ing for an exam today and noticed that they ask you to 'commit reg­is­tra­tion' as opposed to just reg­is­ter­ing.

Little things like this really annoy me, I'm sure that some developer thought this was cool.

Tagged with usability.

Are data grid controls good for end users?

Rod Paddock recently posted on his ex­pe­ri­ences with WPF. Something that jumped out at me was his criticism of Microsoft for omitting a Datagrid control, although a basic grid control is included. The lack of a tra­di­tion­al Datagrid doesn't bother me too much, but I can see how it might impact a lot of developers. WPF is at least six months from release so it's likely a third-party will fill this gap, if Microsoft aren't pressured into writing one.

In case you don't know, the data grid is a UI control for Web and Windows de­vel­op­ment included with every release of .NET so far. It's a staple for UI control vendors and has been replicated in many other de­vel­op­ment en­vi­ron­ments. At a base level it displays data in a tabular format. However most in­cor­po­rate in-place editing and control hosting features.

Perhaps the lack of this control in WPF is a blessing in disguise since developers might stop to think for once. From my experience the data grid control is:

1. Often misused by developers
2. Too heavy­weight on the client
3. Complex for the developer to implement and maintain

As an aside, I'm a big fan of FogBugz and it includes a grid UI for listing cases. However, it also includes a list view, which must be popular with some end users for FogCreek to include this func­tion­al­i­ty.

Onto point two which is only valid when you really care about your users (most line of business developers need not apply!). Grids are heavy on the client if thought is not put into their operation in production. I'm all for avoiding premature op­ti­mi­sa­tion, but avoiding op­ti­mi­sa­tion altogether is something else entirely. Costs for grids on Windows include the memory for the control and data. On the Web you often produce a lot of HTML tables and other junk which has to be delivered to the browser. If ASP.NET is used there is also likely to be su­per­flu­ous viewstate in­for­ma­tion. As you cram more features in you are penalised for each one unless you can se­lec­tive­ly control their use.

My final point, number three, relates to the complexity that you heap upon yourself as you strive to make your ap­pli­ca­tion more complex for end users. Why try to combine editing, deletion and creation of records into one screen? It's often a false economy on behalf of the developer that all of this can be rolled into a single ap­pli­ca­tion form. If I had a penny for the number of a reasonable developer struggles with getting access to the value cell in an ASP.NET Datagrid, I would be very rich.

Getting back to WPF and Vista, I think that developers like Rod need to start looking at how they visualise in­for­ma­tion. Until now, .NET pro­gram­ming has been about ramping up pro­duc­tiv­i­ty on the parts of an ap­pli­ca­tion a user shouldn't experience directly. With WPF it's about how the user interacts with the ap­pli­ca­tion, and this requires the attention to user experience that Web ap­pli­ca­tions have had for years. If the current generation of developers don't wise up and appreciate the im­pli­ca­tions of this technology they will deservedly end up on the scrap heap.

Tagged with datagrid, usability and wpf.